NFA with Epsilon-Transition (ε-NFA) | Epsilon-Closure (ε-Closure) of a state | Extended Transition Function of ε-NFA | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
NFA with Epsilon(ε) Transition (ε-NFA):
The NFA with epsilon-transition is a finite state machine in which the transition from one state to another state is allowed without any input symbol i.e. empty string ε. Adding the transition for the empty string doesn’t increase the computing power of the finite automata but adds some flexibility to construct then DFA and NFA. This are very helpful when we study regular expression (RE) and prove the equivalence between class of language accepted by RE and finite automata.
Formally, ε-NFA is defined by five tuples as:
A = (Q, ∑,𝛿, qo, F),
Where,
Q = set of finite states
∑ = set of finite input symbols
𝛿= a transition fimction that maps: Q✕Z ∪ {ε}→ 2^Q
qo= Initial state, qoЄQ
F = set of final states; F⊆Q
For Example:-
Fig: ε-NFA accepting the language {a, aa, ab, abb, b, bbb, ...................
Transition Table:-
Epsilon-closure (ε-closure) of a state:
The s-closure of a state of ε-NFA is the set of stats those can be eased from that state with s-transition. The a-closure is defined as recursively as:
Basis: state q is in ε-closure (q).
Induction: If state q is reached with s-transition from state q, p is in ε-closure (q). And if there is
an arc from p to r labeled 2, then r is in ε-closure (q) and so on.
For Example:
ε-closure (P) = {p,q,r,s}
ε-closure (q) = {q, s}
ε-closure (r) = {r}
ε-closure (s) = {s}
ε-closure (t) = {t}
ε-closure (u) = {u,w,y}
ε-closure (v) = {v, x, y}
ε-closure (w) = {w, y}
ε-closure (x) = {x, y}
ε-closure (y) = {y}
Extended Transition Function of ε-NFA:
The extended transition function of ε-NFA denoted by 𝛿cap, is defined as:
Basis: 𝛿cap(q, e) = ε-closure (q)
Induction:
Let w = xa be a string, where x is substring of w without last symbol a and a ∈ E but a≠ε.
Let 𝛿cap(q, x) = {p1, p2,...., pk} i.e. pi are the states that can be reached from q following path labeled x which can end with many ε & can have many ε.
Also let,
Then,
Example:
Compute for string ba
𝛿cap(p, 2) = e-closure (p) = {p, q, r, u}
Compute for b
𝛿(p, b)∪ 𝛿(q, b) ∪ 𝛿(r, b) ∪ 𝛿(u, b) = {s, v)
ε-colsure (s) ∪ ε-closure (v) = {s, t, v}
Compurerfor next input a
𝛿(s, a) ∪ 𝛿(t, a) ∪ 𝛿(v, a) = {y, w}
ε-closure (y) ∪ ε-closure (w) = { y, w}
The final result set contains the one of the final state so the string is accepted.
Related Posts:-
Automata Theory | Deterministic Finite Automata (DFA) | Transition Table | Transition Diagrams | Language of DFA | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
Non Deterministic Finite Automata | Language of NFA | Extended transition function of NFA | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
Eliminating Epsilon transition (ε-Transitions) | Conversion of Epsilon-NFA to DFA | Conversion of Epsilon-NFA to NFA | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
Moore and Mealy Machine | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
Non Deterministic Finite Automata | Language of NFA | Extended transition function of NFA | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
Eliminating Epsilon transition (ε-Transitions) | Conversion of Epsilon-NFA to DFA | Conversion of Epsilon-NFA to NFA | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
Moore and Mealy Machine | Theory Of Computation (TOC)
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours